Pages

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Latest Rumors on Apple Television - could ship in 2012

Apple Wants To Offer Subscription TV Packages, Analyst Says
The rumour mill for a supposed integrated Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) TV set is cranking up, with noted Taiwanese circuits news source Digitimes reporting Apple’s supply chain companies will start making components in the first quarter of 2012.
“Apple’s schedule (is) to launch the new display products in the second or the third quarter of 2012, according to industry sources,” Digitimes says.
“Media reports in Korea also indicated that Samsung Electronics started producing chips for the iTVs in November 2011, while Sharp will produce the displays for the new TVs.” The screens will be 32 and 37 inches, the site says, citing “sources in the supply chain”.
Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu writes this note…
“Frankly, we are not surprised and believe AAPL should enter the TV space as this is arguably the only major end market the company is not currently participating in a bigger way.
“Moreover, we have picked up several data points indicating activity from component makers to manufacturing partners as well as AAPL’s own patent filings from at least 2005.
“We believe it makes sense for AAPL to produce Apple TV in both a set-top box as well as an integrated all-in-one version to give users choice.
“From our understanding, the technology including hardware and software isn’t the issue holding back a real Apple TV from shipping. What is are content partnerships and licensing terms that still need to be ironed out, as we mentioned in late-October.
“Today, iTunes has a rich library of movies and TV shows but it is mostly for downloads and only movies are available for rental (TV shows once were but were terminated in August 2011). What’s missing is live broadcast television.
“One obvious way to offer this is via the traditional way where a user subscribes to cable or satellite. But a more revolutionary, disruptive and differentiated way, is via the internet or IPTV which would be more in-line with its iTunes and iCloud model. Because of the high dependence on content providers, we believe exact timing is difficult to pinpoint.
“We continue to hear what AAPL would love to do is offer users the ability to choose their own customized programming, i.e., whichever channels/shows they want for a monthly subscription fee. This is obviously much more complicated from a licensing standpoint. And in our view, would change the game for television and give AAPL a big leg-up against the competition.”
Google’s Eric Schmidt this month said Google (NSDQ: GOOG) TV would be in the majority of TVs by mid-2012.
Sony (NYSE: SNE) has sold its almost 50 percent stake in its LCD screen-making JV, S-LCD, to JV partner Samsung for $940 million, Reuters reports, noting how analysts say the market peaked last year after many western TV owners have converted to flat-screen.
Various authorities have, in recent years, accused LCD makers of having conspired to fix industry prices. Samsung and Sharp are amongst seven LCD makers who have agreed to pay more than $553 million in relation to the charges, Reuters reports separately.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Television Business - How much Money can we lose?!

Bottom line - companies need to stop adding in features that US consumers are no willing to pay for. If the value is not there, why lose money bringing items to market that simply have to be marked down. R&D expense goes down the drain. Inventory piles up and is heavily discounted which continues to put quicker unnecessary downward pressure on pricing. US consumer is clearly saying I pay for SIZE and PRICE - BASIC PICTURE QUALITY. We can try to make up a new category as much as we like, but at the end of the day a TV is a TV, the rest is NICHE. If we don't wake up and change direction the TV category will be the next CE category that becomes nothing but a commodity item. This hurts the CE companies, and retailers , and eventually it will be same for consumers. 6-8 years of the Same Old Same Old at CES. No reason to innovate if no one understand the product, value, feature, and converts that to a benefit , need, and attributes a value they are willing to pay to have that item bring those benefits to them.

JZ

For the first time, the average price of a 47-inch flat-panel television is less than $1,000, good news for consumers but the latest sign of tough times for the TV industry.
The psychologically important sub-$1,000 mark—based on a forecast by market researcher NPD DisplaySearch—signals larger screen sizes are becoming affordable to more Americans as a glut of sets and components erodes prices.
Technology companies are banking on everything from smart TVs to low-cost phones as the top trends for 2012. The WSJ's Deborah Kan talks to technology editor Yun-Hee Kim.
But such a slump bodes poorly for the profits of set manufacturers, as well as companies such as Corning Inc., the largest supplier of liquid-crystal-display glass for TVs, and Best Buy Co., the largest consumer electronics chain by revenue.
Prices for the 46- to 47-inch screen size, the largest before "big-screen" models of 50 inches or more, are expected to average $940 in 2011, down from $1,020 last year, said Paul Gagnon, DisplaySearch's director of North American TV research.
"We've got these large screen sizes like 40-inch and 46-inch size class products that are relatively affordable," Mr. Gagnon said. "It's really starting to drive a lot of upgrades."
The low prices reflect slower-than-expected demand and excess production capacity, the research and consulting firm said. DisplaySearch said it expects price erosion to be less significant in 2012.
The pricing woes have reverberated through the television supply chain, leading to losses at LCD panel makers such as LG Display Co. and recent plans by Sony Corp. to slash costs at its money-losing TV operation.
Corning last month slashed its fourth-quarter profit estimates, saying LCD glass prices had fallen farther than expected and that a major South Korean customer backed out of part of a sales contract. Corning said its TV display business had never seen a customer renege on part of an LCD order.
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Some consumers went up in TV size instead of features for about the same price. Above, Best Buy customers wheel away a Sharp 60-inch TV.
Retailers have also been burned by lower prices, though Best Buy reported earlier this month TV sales declines at a slower pace in the company's fiscal third quarter than in previous periods.
TV makers have introduced new technologies—such as LED backlights, higher frame rates and 3-D—to bolster demand, but price-sensitive consumers, especially in North America, seem reluctant to pay higher costs for premium features, NPD DisplaySearch said.
In many cases, consumers are opting to trade up in size, rather than features, for a similar amount of money, DisplaySearch said.
Overall, 2.4 million 3-D units were sold in North America, making up 8% of units. The premium for the feature on an average 55-inch set has dropped to about 17% from 33% in the third quarter of 2011, but its adoption is still slower than anticipated. LED backlights carry premiums of 25% to 30%.
Write to Matt Jarzemsky at matthew.jarzemsky@dowjones.com and Ben Fox Rubin at ben.rubin@dowjones.com


Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203479104577124932742565596.html#ixzz1hrC6f7w7

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Sony sells their half of LCD production to Samsung

How tough is this Television business. Sony exits making the CORE part in the Television, the Panel. Not sure how this will work out for them long term given the 8 straight years of negative profit. In the CRT days their Tube and their Technology in the set kept them on top. But since moving to Projection TV , switch to 16 by 9 , and now with Flat Panel they have really lost their way. Need some good news from Sony, not more bad news!

JZ

Sony Sells Stake In S-LCD Joint Venture

By Greg Tarr -- TWICE, 12/27/2011

Tokyo - Sony said Monday that it has begun streamlining its television manufacturing operations and has sold its nearly 50 percent stake in a joint-venture LCD panel factory to co-owner Samsung.

The move affirmed reports out of Japan several months ago that Sony was looking to scale back its television making operations due to increasingly difficult market conditions, including the strong value of the yen against the dollar and South Korean won, and the sustained economic meltdown which has hindered consumer demand for more profitable products.

Revealingly, Sony waited for one of the slowest news days of the year in the Western world - the day after Christmas - to make its less-than-positive pronouncement.

Sony, which ranks in the top three selling TV brands in the U.S. with its Bravia sub-branded LCD TVs, said in a statement that it would sell its stake in the jointly owned manufacturer, S-LCD company, to Samsung of South Korea for $939 million.

The joint venture was established in Tanjeong, South Korea, in April 2004.

However, Sony said it would maintain its LCD TV marketing business in part by outsourcing. It also retains a 7 percent stake in an LCD joint venture panel factory with Sharp.

Last month, Sony warned that it would lose money for the fourth year in a row in its current financial year, which ends next March.

Sony said it expects to show a loss of 66 billion yen, or $856 million, for the last three months of 2011 because of its exit from the Samsung joint venture.

The move, however, should reduce costs in its LCD business by 50 billion yen a year, the company said.

Sony said it would continue to purchase LCD panels from Samsung based on market prices.

Samsung officials said in a regulatory filing Monday that it had approved the plan.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Multitasking with your Television

Are apps for your Smartphone or Tablet the answer?

See the article below:

JZ

Using Another Screen to Interact With the TV



This week families will gather to celebrate the holidays over home-cooked meals, gift exchanges and fights over the TV remote.
That last annual tradition may be dying off, thanks to changing technology habits. More people now watch TV while simultaneously using second screens like tablets, laptops and smartphones. A recent Nielson study showed 70% of tablet owners and 68% of smartphone owners said they use their devices while watching television.
Sitting down to watch TV and only TV seems like a thing of the past. WSJ's Katherine Boehret profiles three apps that allow viewers a more interactive watching experience.
I, too, find myself watching TV in this multi-tasking mode. This week, I've been testing three free apps that aim to get viewers more engaged in shows as they watch them on TV. Ironically, these apps require people to look away from the TV and at their second screens, but in my experience, this actually worked. I tried Yahoo's IntoNow, which runs on iPhone and iPad and Android smartphones; Showtime Social, which works on the iPad; and Shazam, which works on nearly all mobile platforms, including Apple, RIM, Android and Windows Phones.
I had fun with these apps, and each uses a different method to draw in users. IntoNow and Showtime Social poll viewers during shows, Shazam displays behind-the-scenes footage, and IntoNow displays related social-network updates and live discussions. The apps virtually introduced me to fans of shows I liked, reminding me of my freshman year of college when I piled into a dorm room with 20 people (many of whom I didn't know) to watch the series finale of "Felicity:" The show got more interesting in the company of other fans.
The Showtime Social iPad app polled 'Dexter' viewers to gauge reactions to the show.
Unfortunately, some aspects of these apps aren't designed to work with pre-recorded shows—and more viewers, especially the ones likely to use a second screen, are recording their TV these days. Showtime Social must be used as a show airs. Shazam works with pre-recorded TV shows, but to work with commercials, it must be used live or for as long as an ad campaign is still running. And though IntoNow will work with a pre-recorded show, discussions and related Twitter content aren't live when you use the app after the show airs.
I started with Yahoo's IntoNow app on the iPad. It has a green TV icon in the top left corner that, when I tapped it, listens to whatever is playing. Using its patented SoundPrint technology, IntoNow figured out what was on by matching it against a database of over 160 million hours of TV.
I hesitated to use IntoNow while watching my pre-recorded shows, especially the season finale of "The Amazing Race," for fear of accidentally seeing something that would spoil the ending. The app asks users who contribute to discussions to mark their comments with a spoiler alert symbol, but I didn't want to take any chances.
While watching a football game, IntoNow provided expanded statistics and other team news.
IntoNow was a real help while watching football: Statistics showed up in Game Info, and other team news appeared in an Around the League section. It also brought in Twitter updates from the @NFL_Football Twitter account. But when I paused the game for 20 minutes to fold laundry, I didn't want to look at the app because it showed the live score.
IntoNow failed when I turned on CNN for news of Kim Jong Il's death. The app thought I was watching the regularly scheduled program, a show called "Black in America." IntoNow's vice president said the app has trouble with unplanned programming, something the company is addressing.
The Showtime Social iPad app only works when a show is airing, and it prompts viewers to share their reactions to the show. I watched an episode of "Dexter" with this app opened, and questions popped up every so often, polling the audience. These questions were playful enough that even someone like me, who hadn't watched "Dexter" in two years, could answer them. More thought-provoking questions delved into symbolism and future predictions.
When Showtime Social wasn't asking polling questions, it prompted me to comment on how the show made me feel. I tapped on an icon under the "I am…" description and chose from happy, shocked, sad or angry. A drop-down menu within each emotion offered several iterations; the "angry" category had 13 emotions to choose from.
[DSOLUTION]
Viewers using Shazam could buy things that they saw on USA Network's 'Covert Affairs.
Shazam is an app known best for identifying songs as they play, but it also works with movies, TV shows, ads and music videos to display extra features. To use it with TV, the Shazam logo appears on screen during shows to remind users that they can use the app with a tablet or smartphone; in the case of short commercials, this moment passes quickly.
Since many shows are on hiatus around the holidays, it was hard to find live examples for testing this app. But past examples include the Shazam logo appearing in an Old Navy commercial, and people who used Shazam while watching could get a free pair of jeans. It also worked with Oxygen's "The Glee Project," showing viewers the full version of judge's deliberations if they tapped the Shazam button. And when Shazam was used with USA Network's "Covert Affairs," viewers could buy things that they saw on the show.
Instead of just watching TV, these apps help you get a lot more out of a show—as long as you're watching live.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Television - what do customers really want

I have a bit of a problem with the types of articles below generated off of consumer research. First and most important, most people do not know WHAT a connected TV does, or more importantly does NOT do. Given the fact that IPTVs do NOT integrate your current line up with the potential of streaming content, it is generally not what people are THINKING of when they answer on-line questionnaires of this sort. It makes for a great article, and claims that we THINK we know what people want, but that data was out there for 3D TV before and why there was a bunch of inventory out there that no one wanted back in May of this year. Also people do not understand that a connected TV still requires you to subscribe numerous time, to a variety of services that all may not add up to what you want to watch. (this is a big reason that CORD CUTTING is NOT happening - people are downgrading the service and living with less options, but when you look through the data, there is actually very LITTLE cord cutting going on)

Final Word - be careful what you chase after based on limited, and questionable data. Without knowing the number of people, actual questions in detail asked, and the level of understanding of those that responded, the data has little if any value.

JZ



Consumers Prefer Connected TV Over 3D

by Aaron Baar, Yesterday, 6:08 PM
/Watching-Despite all of the options available to get one’s visual entertainment, television still is one of the most popular devices out there. According to new consumer research from Parks Associates, 20% of all U.S. households with broadband intend to purchase a new flat-panel television by the end of the year.
Among those households intending to buy a new TV set, nearly three-quarters plan to buy a TV with advanced features like 3D or built-in Internet connectivity, but they’re going much more for the latter than the former.
While the findings don’t necessarily represent the death knell for 3DTV (which has had trouble catching on with consumers), they do show that consumer interests lie elsewhere. “It’s definitely a reflection of consumer sentiment today that is much more highly geared to connectivity and its practical benefit; that is, greater access to content through services such as Netflix and others,” Kurt Scherf, vice president and principal analyst at Parks Associates, tells Marketing Daily. “We’re actually seeing 3D and connected technologies built into a large number of televisions, so consumers are actually getting both capabilities. It’s just that online access to content resonates more strongly with them today.”
With prices coming down, more middle-class families are also getting into the game of buying these advanced TVs, Scherf says. According to the report, 20% of middle class households (those with annual incomes of $50,000 - $75,000) intend to purchase smart TVs this holiday season, compared with 12% of households with incomes about $75,000. Another factor: children. Families with children in the house were more likely to buy an advanced television than those without kids (17% vs. 10%).
But what’s good news for the television makers could be bad news for the content providers, specifically the ones bringing programming into the house. According to the report, consumers who intend to purchase a smart TV this holiday season are also more likely to cancel or downgrade their pay-TV service packages within the next year.
“Through services such as Netflix, Hulu Plus, and ESPN 3, consumers can find a growing number of television content through online outlets,” Scherf says. “As consumers consider their monthly expenditures and think about what content can be found via online channels, smart TVs and other connected consumer electronics present an ever-viable option for consumers to watch programming.”

Monday, December 19, 2011

Apple / Televisions - Latest rumors / talk on the subject

Apple Plots Its TV Assault

  • by JESSICA E. VASCELLARO And SAM SCHECHNER
  • Apple Inc. is moving forward with its assault on television, following up on the ambitions of its late co-founder, Steve Jobs.
    In recent weeks, Apple executives have discussed their vision for the future of TV with media executives at several large companies, according to people familiar with the matter.
    WSJ's Sam Schechner reports on Apple's plans to build its own television that would feature wireless streaming to access shows, movies and content.
    Apple is also working on its own television that relies on wireless streaming technology to access shows, movies and other content, according to people briefed on the project.
    In the recent meetings with media companies, the Apple executives, including Senior Vice President Eddy Cue, have outlined new ways Apple's technology could recognize users across phones, tablets and TVs, people familiar with the talks said.
    In at least one meeting, Apple described future television technology that would respond to users' voices and movements, one of the people said. Such technology, which Apple indicated may take longer than some of its other ideas, might allow users to use their voices to search for a show or change channels.
    Apple is still saying little about what specific software and devices it is working on. The people familiar with the meetings said the Cupertino, Calif., company was "vague" and that Apple hasn't made proposals to license shows for any new product offering.
    Still, the talks—some of which were made at the request of media companies seeking an update on Apple's plans—suggest that Apple's TV strategy is advancing. The technology company often keeps its products and ideas, close to the vest until as late as possible.
    Apple executives have given some specifics in its talks with media companies. The company, for example, has discussed new ways they could stream media companies' content, allowing a user to watch a video on a TV set, then pick up another device, such as a smartphone, and keep watching the video on the move, one of the people familiar said.
    Another person familiar with the talks said the types of new services Apple and the media companies are discussing could be done with Apple's existing technologies, which include its Apple TV set-top box.
    Getty Images
    Apple's Eddy Cue, seen in October, is involved in the company's TV plans.
    Around three months after it started selling a new, $99 version of the set-top box last year, Apple said it had sold more than a million but hasn't provided sales figures since.
    Apple's uptick in talks with its media partners is part of the company's strategy to change the way consumers watch TV, just as the company transformed the music and cellphone industries. Mr. Jobs envisioned building a TV that would be controlled by Apple's mobile devices in order to be easier to use and more personalized, according to people familiar with the matter.
    The company has worked on prototypes for years. Before his death in October, Mr. Jobs told biographer Walter Isaacson that he had "finally cracked it," according to Mr. Isaacson's book.
    The TV device Apple is working on would use a version of Apple's wireless-streaming technology AirPlay to allow users to control it from iPhones and iPads, according to people briefed on the matter. When the company plans to start selling such a device and whether it would receive traditional broadcast or cable signals remains unclear, said these people, who say Apple may change its plans.
    The technology could allow users to stream video from mobile devices to their televisions, without a set-top box. That process is already possible through its Apple TV set-top box, but it is cumbersome and some media companies, such as Time Warner Inc.'s cable channel HBO, prevent their apps from using the technology because they want closer control of how and where their content appears. An HBO spokesman says it hopes to use AirPlay once it is comfortable with the antipiracy protection.
    Apple has worked on technologies for integrating DVR storage and iCloud, its online syncing and storage service, into the device, according to a person briefed on the matter. Such technologies could allow users to watch shows they have saved or purchased on two different devices, like a TV and a computer, without having to buy or record the shows twice.
    Other media outlets have reported that Apple is developing a TV. An Apple spokesman declined to comment.
    Apple is one of a number of companies rushing to re-imagine TV by making it resemble watching video on devices like computers and tablets. Like Apple, these companies are taking the approach of trying to tie together the multitude of devices consumers use daily but that don't currently talk to each other.
    Google Inc. is trying to enable users to access apps and Internet video on traditional TVs through its Google TV software, which shares some technology with its Android mobile operating system and can be controlled via Android and iPhone apps. Microsoft Corp. offers a mobile app to search for and play entertainment content on its Xbox live gaming console, which streams an array of video. Cable, satellite and phone companies are launching their own video services for computers and tablets and reformatting their traditional interfaces to resemble them.
    The efforts are changing the definition of television and the business models around it. In the past, watching television meant tuning in to a TV network live. Now, it means watching video on a broad array of devices from a growing number of providers.
    The pace of change puts media companies that make TV shows and program TV channels in a dilemma. On one hand, they hope that they can increase their profits by selling new services on new devices. But they are worried that a proliferation of new services could undermine the existing TV business, which brings in more than $150 billion a year in the U.S. in advertising and consumer spending on monthly TV subscriptions from cable, satellite and telecommunications companies.
    What kind of cooperation Apple is seeking from media companies remains unclear. Over the years, Apple has had mixed success getting television companies to agree to new business arrangements for its iTunes store.
    The company has also talked to television-service providers about teaming up on new video services for Apple devices, according to people familiar with the matter. It has also broached the idea of licensing content directly from media companies for some sort of subscription-TV service, resembling the packages offered now by cable operators, but the talks have been "exploratory," according to people familiar with the matter.
    In meetings as far back as 2010, Mr. Jobs met with a series of cable and satellite executives to discuss next-generation television services for Apple devices, according to people familiar with the matter. Among the questions Mr. Jobs asked in the series of meetings was how much of the universe of video content the providers actually had the rights to, according to a person familiar with the meetings.
    Apple's own executives have wondered what the company had up its sleeve. Last year, at its "top 100" meeting for senior managers in Carmel, Calif., an attendee asked Mr. Jobs whether Apple was developing a television.
    He responded that it would be a bad business to get into, noting that the margins on television are far lower than the margins Apple makes from its other devices and that consumers don't buy new televisions very frequently, according to this person.
    Write to Jessica E. Vascellaro at jessica.vascellaro@wsj.com and Sam Schechner at sam.schechner@wsj.com

    Televisions at CES are almost here!

     
  • Better 3D, voice control, more apps: How CES 2012 will advance the TV

    by and
    Will TV makers tout 3D again or allow it to fade into "just another feature" territory? We're guessing "tout."
    (Credit: Sarah Tew/CNET )
    Welcome to CNET's predictions for the TV hardware category at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas.
    Dave Katzmaier here. I want to do something different for the 2012CES preview. After nearly 10 years of handling TV reviews and coverage at CNET essentially by myself, I'm now joined by a colleague whose main beat is also TVs: Ty Pendlebury.
    He's already written afewreviewsandblogposts, done his share of videos and podcasts, and he also has plenty of experience reviewing TVs for CNET Australia and has attended CES in that capacity. So we decided it would be cool for Ty and I to write separate CES TV previews and lump them into this post. Just to keep it interesting, neither of us consulted with the other on what we're writing here, so look upon the repetition not as tedious, but as further confirmation of the inevitable near future.

    Dave's divinations

    More passive 3D, cheaper active glasses with a universal standard, better 3D PQ. Even with passive 3D's picture quality issues, its cheap glasses and practicality advantages over active mean that more TV makers than just LG, Vizio, and Toshiba will sign on to the passive bandwagon in 2012. Meanwhile active glasses will get cheaper and we'll hear about the Full HD 3D Glasses Initiative, a universal 3D glasses standard that allows interoperability between different makers' active specs. Finally I expect 3D picture quality for both active and passive technologies to improve, although I'm doubtful anybody will announce "full-resolution passive" at the show.
    LEDs will outnumber non-LED LCDs. Add CCFL-based LCD TVs to the list of "almost dead" TV technologies. Despite their potentially very good picture quality, these old-school backlights will be tough to find at CES and even stores in 2012, replaced by LEDs of every variety--including a resurgence of non-edge-lit full-array models at the entry-level.
    Better Internet suites, more Web browsers, and Google TV, voice control/search, and built-in Skype. TV makers have plenty to improve upon interactivity-wise. Nearly everyone should have built-in Wi-Fi, I expect more QWERTY remote controls, and manufacturers will continue to tout new apps. Web browsers will be even more common on TVs, but they'll probably still suck. I should also see more models equipped with the new, but still disappointing, Honeycomb version of Google TV. More promising, I'd like to see voice control and universal video search a la the new Xbox 360, as well as the ability to use big-screen Skype without having to buy a separate speakerphone accessory.

    Sharp's 70-incher: Big in person, puny thumbnail.
    Bigger and cheaper. Sharp's resurgence in 2011 with its relatively affordable 70-inch TVs hints that other makers will also strive to make jumbo flat panels more affordable.
    Cameos by bigger OLED and glasses-free 3D. CES wouldn't be CES without appearances in booths by next-gen tech that won't see store shelves that year, and my nominees are 40-inch-plus OLED (LG, I'm looking at you) and glasses-free 3D (Toshiba, pick up the white courtesy phone). If either is announced as "real products," it'll cost enough to make the Elite look cheap...but they're sure to nab plenty of video footage and breathless blogging. Bring it on, 2012!

    Pendlebury's prognostications


    Kinect in your TV. Steve Jobs may have "cracked the code" of simplifying a television's user interface, and many people have suggested a Siri-type voice-guided interaction between user and TV. Apple won't be the first company to do voice control of TV content, though; that honor now belongs to the Xbox Kinect with its latest update. But it's not yet a part of your TV. At CES 2012, I think we'll see at least one TV featuring technology from Israeli company PrimeSense, which develops the 3D sensors used in Kinect. Likely candidates for this are Vizio, LG, and Samsung, but there'll probably be some Chinese manufacturers showing off similar tech, too. Having a Webcam in your TV also enables Kinect-style gaming and no-hassle Skype-ing.
    Bezel-less TVs. In the coming years, soup kitchens will be filled with lines of dejected TV designers as there will actually be nothing left to design but the stand. TVs such as this year's Samsung D7000 have shown the way with an incredibly slim bezel, and in 2012 this trend will continue with TV bezels barely wider than a pencil line.
    OLED. OLED won't be a viable technology until about 2015, but this year we'll see more bendy, wacky, and see-through OLED panels. Samsung and LG are reportedly readying large-screen OLEDs for this year, and in coming years we'll see plasma dovetail off and OLED take a hold.
    1080p passive 3D. While there will inevitably be more "glasses-free" 3D televisions displayed at CES 2012, the technology needs you to keep your head locked in place or else you lose the effect. I think there will be 1080p passive TVs at the show, where the TV performs the shutter effect--this is opposed to active systems, which feature shutter glasses. At present, passive TVs halve the resolution of the TV and interlacing-like artifacts are a big problem.
    Remote viewing apps. ESPN has a remote app, and most cable companies now have apps letting you watch TV on youriPad, so why not the TV itself? All connected TVs now offer some form of remote control via smartphone, but I can see this extend to watching content directly from the TV tuner or HDMI input. Watching your favorite Blu-ray movie on your iPad? The copyright implications will trouble the movie studios, but I think it's coming.


    Thursday, December 15, 2011

    Television Trends - Video Game Console Streaming

    Do you need a SMART TV? Data would show that streaming is becoming more popular on devices already connected to the TV that do a fantastic job at allowing you to stream content to your TV. TVs are expected to be in a home for 7-9 years on average. With the technology curve and trends in streaming it would make more sense for the steaming device to NOT be built into the TV. People will not be happy to find out the technology in their TV is outdated and can no longer be upgraded in 2-4 years basically forcing a replacement of the TV well before the expected lifespan of the TV.

    JZ




    Viewers watching more streaming video on game consoles


    XboxNetflix
    Video game consoles aren't just for gaming anymore.
    Increasingly, people are using their Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii devices to stream movies and TV shows, according to a survey released Wednesday by the Nielsen Co.
    Because all three consoles readily connect to the Internet, viewers can use them to access video-on-demand services like Netflix, Hulu Plus, YouTube, Major League Baseball Network and ESPN to watch on their TV screens rather than on small computer monitors.
    And that seems to be just what consumers are doing. Streaming video accounted for 14% of the average time spent using Microsoft Corp.'s Xbox 360 in October, up from 10% a year earlier, according to a Nielsen survey of 3,000 people.
    For Sony Corp.'s PS3, the share of streaming video was 15% this year, up from 9% last year. The shift was even more dramatic for Nintendo Co.'s Wii, which jumped to 33% from 20%.
    Xbox and PlayStation users also spent an additional 5% of their time watching movies and television shows they paid to download, an option not available on the Wii.
    That's good news for studios looking to make more money through digital distribution. Game consoles, along with the Apple TV, are the most popular ways to reach people who want to watch video on their high-definition televisions.
    It's more troubling for television networks seeking to boost their ratings and ad revenue, however. The new data emphasize that consoles aren't stealing viewers' attention just with video games but also with content that serves as a direct substitute for traditional TV watching.
    Game consoles have proved particularly effective for Netflix. An earlier Nielsen survey found that half of the users who utilize its streaming offerings do so on the PlayStation, Xbox or Wii.
    Two of the consoles are also popular as DVD players. People spend 15% of their time on PS3s watching DVDs or Blu-ray discs. Sony's device is the only console that plays Blu-ray discs and is the best-selling Blu-ray player on the market. Xbox 360 users spend 9% of their time watching DVDs. The Wii does not play movies on discs.
    Below is a Nielsen chart summarizing the survey results.
    Nielsen Video Game Console Usage

    Friday, December 9, 2011

    Voice Control Television

    Most important question - Does it matter? What the article misses is where you get your content from. Most of us already DO NOT USE the remote that comes with the TV but the one that is supplied by the cable provider or satellite provider. If you do not use the menu or channel function of the TV remote, having a TV brand build in voice recognition will add cost to your set with ZERO benefit.

    If the cable guys, and satellite guys add it to their box and replace the one you have (this is a very slow process and there is a LARGE number of old boxes that get recycled well before any new hardware is added) you may get this benefit.

    Remember Cable Ready TVs - Get rid of the box, and you just use the remote that came with your TV , how did that one turn out.


    Don't get me wrong, I think voice control for your TV would be great, but it is not just about getting it to recognize and work in a living room or family room.

    JZ



    Voice Control, the End of the TV Remote?

    Samsung, LG, and others are racing to bring voice control to the TV set

    No one knows for sure what “it” is, and Isaacson isn’t saying. But many tech executives agree that an Apple TV set is likely to make use of humankind’s most natural interface: the voice. Already, millions of Apple customers are talking to their new iPhone 4S, thanks to a program called Siri that tries to provide an answer to questions like, “How’s the weather today?” Whether the rumors are true that Apple is planning to release a TV set by 2013, Siri-like voice recognition is headed for the living room. Microsoft is already there, via its Xbox 360 game console, and Comcast, Samsung Electronics, LG, and Sharp are working on voice-enabled features for TV sets, set-top boxes, and related products. Mike Thompson, senior vice-president at Nuance Communications, the world’s largest supplier of voice recognition technology, says “a wave” of device makers will ship products that understand voice commands next year.
    It’s easy to see the appeal. Few would be upset if, instead of figuring out which one of three remotes to use, viewers could sit on the couch and say, “Record the next episode of Modern Family.” And while a growing percentage of new TVs connect to the Internet, many customers are put off by overly complex controls or on-screen keyboards that require the user to type by moving a cursor at an excruciatingly slow pace, says Jakob Nielsen, a product usability expert and co-founder of design consultancy Nielsen Norman Group. “Anything would be better than what we have now,” he says. “We can only go up from here.”
    Microsoft has the early lead thanks to Kinect, an Xbox peripheral with cameras and motion sensors for hands-free gaming. Kinect also has sensitive microphones. After waking up the system by saying “Xbox,” subscribers to Microsoft’s $60-a-year Xbox LIVE service can search for shows, movies, and games by speaking to Microsoft’s Bing search engine. “You get a lot of claims saying, ‘We’re about to transform TV,’ ” says Ross Honey, general manager of Xbox LIVE entertainment and advertising for Microsoft. “We already have.”
    Most consumers’ first opportunity to talk to their TVs—and have them listen—will be through voice-enabled apps for their smartphone or tablet. More than 3 million Comcast subscribers have downloaded an app that turns their smartphone into a remote control for the company’s Xfinity broadband service. Comcast is looking at adding voice-control features to the app, says spokeswoman Jennifer Khoury. Samsung and Sharp are developing similar apps of their own, according to people familiar with their plans. This may well have been the approach Jobs had in mind. According to one former Apple manager who asked to remain anonymous because he was not authorized to speak publicly, Jobs saw little reason for a stand-alone remote when iPhones and iPads can do the job better.
    Others are looking to fix rather than eliminate the remote. Nuance’s Thompson says TV, DVD, and set-top box makers are all working on models that look more like iPhones, some with touchscreens rather than that gaggle of unused buttons. Some of the prototypes are designed around a single prominent button that activates a microphone, he says. Cost will be a challenge, since such a device would need a microphone and Wi-Fi antenna instead of the infrared sensors now commonly used. Industry politics will also be an issue. Since having every electronic box within earshot respond at once would be a nightmare, equipment makers need to agree on which device runs the show.

    Thursday, December 8, 2011

    3D Television

    Will it be Gaming and Sports that make 3D Television at home work? Sony thinks so... see the article below.

    JZ

    Sony Pictures CEO: 3D Blu-ray Movies Not Enough to Drive Household Adoption

    7 Dec, 2011By: Erik Gruenwedel




    Hollywood’s marketing of 3D Blu-ray Disc movies won’t be enough to drive wider consumer adoption of 3D in the home, the head of Sony Pictures said.
    Speaking Dec. 7 in an investor call with William Blair & Co.in Chicago, Michael Lynton, CEO of Sony Pictures Entertainment, said in-home adoption of 3D has been stymied by a dearth of compelling content beyond movies.
    Lynton said greater availability of sports programming and video games in 3D would help jumpstart the format among consumers.
    Indeed, with many games already available in 3D and early attempts to broadcast college football — in addition to the 2010 Beijing Olympics and The Masters — well-received, the belief is that expanded sports coverage could help 3D clear remaining hurdles into the home.
    “It’s going to be based on what people want to watch,” Lynton said. “I don’t think that [3D] movies are going to drive [in-home adoption.]”
    The CEO said consumers want to watch 3D movies in the home, but he believes that sports and video gaming will be more of a “pull” for consumers compared with movies. Adoption would be driven by "sports, nature programming like what Discovery is doing, and gaming," he said.
    Sony, IMAX and Discovery Channel are partners in 3Dnet, the 3DTV channel carried by DirecTV and other multichannel video programing distributors.
    “I think gaming will be a major driver,” Lynton said.
    Sony is releasing seven theatrical movies in 3D in 2012, including reboots of the “Spider-Man” and “Men in Black” franchises. At the same time, domestic 3D viewership on new releases ranges from 40% to 60%, which is down from previous years, according to William Blair.
    Meanwhile, international 3D theatrical attendance is up 60%, due in part to the novelty of the format.
    “Part of the reason is that [3D movies] are newer [abroad] and you are continuing to see digital screens roll out more aggressively because there are fewer of them,” Lynton said, adding that Sony would only release titles in 3D if the format enhanced the quality of the movie.