Pages

Monday, April 30, 2012

Televisions - who is now on top of the industry and who is struggling

Great article describing the TV industry and why the Japanese companies are struggling and how aggressive others are being now, as well as continue to invest and plan for the future.

JZ

As Japan’s tech industry bleeds, Asian giants wrestle for TV control


Reuters, 29 Apr 2012 | 12:04 PM
 
 
LG Electronics will steal a march on its rivals by bringing forward the launch of a 55-inch flat TV using next-generation technology, raising the stakes in a cut-throat battle for the living room between Asia's top tech powerhouses.

The South Korean firm will introduce its organic light emitting display (OLED) TV in several European countries in May, well ahead of an original plan to launch in the second half, a source familiar with the matter said.

That would edge out cross-town rival Samsung Electronics and cement, at least for now, South Korean dominance in the television market over long-time leaders Japan, but it also highlights the fierce competition reshaping Asia's flat panel industry.

"(In the past) if you wanted a top quality TV you had to buy a Sharp, Panasonic or Sony. Those days are gone," said Steve Durose, senior director and head of Asia-Pacific at Fitch Ratings.

The Japanese, who ruled the global TV market in the 1980s and 1990s, have been battered by their aggressive South Korean rivals, weak demand for the TVs they make and a stronger yen that erodes the value of the their exports. Sony, Panasonic and Sharp expect to have lost a combined $21 billion in the business year just ended.

Some 200 km across the Korea Strait, LG Electronics is expected to report a quarterly profit of $267 million on Wednesday, even after LG Display, a flat-screen maker in which it has a near-38% stake, posted a $156 million operating loss for January-March.

The red ink bleeding across Japan's tech industry comes at a time when the TV market is heading for a technology choice—between credit-card-thin OLEDs or ultra-high definition sets—that may consign today's LCDs to the bargain shelf. Whoever can mass produce affordable OLEDs will have a headstart.

Sony, for one, will recall with concern how it lost out in a similar consumer technology battle over home videotapes in the 1980s, while Toshiba's HD DVD format was later crushed by Blu-Ray.

IF THE PRICE IS RIGHT
Sony was first to market OLED TV technology in 2007, but halted production of the $2,000 home screens three years later amid a global downturn, and switched its focus to 3D. Sony limits sales of OLED screens costing as much as $26,000 to businesses that can afford the high price tag.

In January, Samsung and LG displayed prototype 55-inch OLED screens at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas. Samsung has already signalled its intent on OLEDs, saying in February it will spin off its LCD panel business.

For makers of OLED displays, which boast sharper images and do not need backlighting, the obstacle to consumer acceptance is price.

You can buy 10 LCD TVs for the likely price of $10,000 for a big Samsung or LG model. That means LCD is likely to remain the dominant force in the global TV market for a while.

An executive at LG Display said an internal study indicated consumers would start buying OLED TVs once the price falls to 1.3 to 1.4 times that of an LCD set.

Japan, meanwhile, has a potential rival offering—ultra high-definition sets, dubbed 4K, that boast pictures four times sharper than today's HDTV sets. Sony, Panasonic and Sharp all have this technology, but face a broadcasting infrastructure hurdle, as television stations would need to record in 4K for viewers to watch the new ultra high-definition standard.

"However, if the sets are used to view video downloaded from the Internet then higher definition could be viewed more easily," said Kazuhira Miura, an industry analyst at SMBC Nikko Securities in Tokyo, potentially giving Japan an edge in any trend for connected smart TVs.

Given that, it's too early to write off the Japanese, but they may need help to get their operations back on track.

GRAND ALLIANCE?
One option being explored is an alliance of Japan's major TV makers, brokered by the government, which would allow them to pool their R&D cash, engineering know-how and eliminate overlapping costs. Japan has already taken a step down this road, with Sony, Toshiba, and Hitachi combining their small LCD operations into Japan Display, a state-sponsored company two-thirds owned by the taxpayer.

But TVs may be a different matter.

"Creating a united maker is going to be hard," said Yoshiharu Izumi, analyst at JPMorgan in Tokyo, citing different corporate cultures and traditions and entrenched feelings of rivalry after decades of competition. "An alliance just to cut costs doesn't really make sense. Of course any tie up doesn't have to be between Japanese companies, it could be Taiwanese."

Indeed, there are signs that cooperation is picking up between Japan and contract manufacturers in its former colony of Taiwan to take on South Korea, another former colony. Taiwan's manufacturers have plants and know-how at low prices as well as a complete supply chain for LCD production.

"The Japanese need the capacity, while the Taiwanese need outlets. Japan has the technology, but may not necessarily be able to implement. So it's a match," said D a vid Hsieh, Taipei-based Greater China market vice president at specialist research firm DisplaySearch. "Because Japan's scale is smaller, that's why it has to work with Taiwan. The added scale in TV panels will match Korea."

MORE COLLABORATION
Recent media reports have linked Sony with AU Optronics in a tie-up to make TVs, while Taiwanese component maker Hon Hai Precision Industry, which belongs to the same Foxconn group as LCD panel maker Chimei Innolux, recently became the top shareholder in Sharp and invested in its Sakai plant, Japan's most advanced LCD facility.

Taiwan's LCD industry would benefit from tie-ups with Japan through increased cooperation and outsourcing. The industry lost $4.3 billion last year, and AU is expected on Thursday to report a first-quarter loss of some $430 million.

"Taiwan doesn't have the edge in many of the technologies," said H.P. Chang, head of research at Taiwan-based specialist LCD industry research company Witview. "Even if your company wants to consolidate, others may not want to. Samsung will not sit and wait for you to grow. Taiwanese and Japanese companies need to explore ways to collaborate."

While Taiwan's government has leaned on banks to help loss-making Chimei extend its loan repayments, it takes the view that any consolidation should be led by the industry itself, though it would look at how it could help.

"I don't think Taiwan's government really wants an industry consolidation because that will create many job losses," said Samson Hung, a Taipei-based analyst for UBS.

But, without consolidation, business will be tough for Taiwanese firms as they lack international branding and their investment costs are forever rising.

"They have to consider how to allocate resources, how to share intellectual property. They have argued for a long time," said Jamie Yeh, Taipei-based analyst at Barclays. "Not just country to country, but they also have to consider cultural and language factors."

CHINA CHASING?
Also in Taiwanese makers' rear-view mirror is China's fledgling panel industry—at a fair distance today, but one that could quickly catch up. Some rising players in China include TCL Corp, BOE Technology, Tianma Microelectronics and Infovision Optoelectronics.

"I think Chinese players will keep working on their own. They don't have financial concerns," said Witview's Chang. "They will keep growing and eventually become a threat to Taiwan's capacity."

Of course, Japan's tech manufacturers could bite the bullet and seek to tie-up with the South Koreans, tapping into their lead in OLED TVs. There is a precedent: Sony had an LCD joint venture with Samsung, though exited it last year.

"Japanese firms will probably be considering OLED tie-ups with not just Taiwanese but also Samsung and LG, as the technology is more likely to become the next display for TVs and they haven't invested heavily into this technology yet," said Ji Mok-hyun, an analyst at Meritz Securities in Seoul.

For now there is an air of confidence in South Korea, looking across at a struggling Japanese industry.

"We've been No.1 in the TV market for six years and I think Japanese firms are sticking to their massive, but unprofitable, TV business simply because it's their legacy business," said a senior executive at Samsung, who asked not to be identified as he was not authorized to speak to the media.

James Jeong, chief financial officer at LG Display, said: "We're talking to TV manufacturers, including Japanese, for cooperation (in OLED supplies). There'll be plenty of opportunities for cooperation and tie-ups in the display industry... as long as it's not your sworn enemy."

A senior LG Electronics executive, who also didn't want to be named, noted problems in Japan in product innovation, supply chain management and slow management decision-making, as well as a focus on the domestic market over exports.

"It's like a swimming contest," the executive said. "Once there's a gap, it's really difficult for the follower to narrow the gap dramatically as the one ahead continues to move ahead."

SMART TV do we really want it? Probably not.

See the article below. I think there are a lot of good points but the ultimate reason for TV needing to be dumb is a bit off the mark. I have already posted on the reports that most of our TV content still is and will continue to be consumed on that main TV in your house. The most enjoyable screen for viewing the majority of the content you watch. I also agree that the USE of the mobile devices will be a great way to browse , sort , store , manage a variety of content you will have stored in the cloud, stream  , whatever. You will NOT replace you main watching experience with a tiny inferior screen. I also don't see the SMART TV being successful as it is NOT a good device to look for and get content for your TV. I expect 3DTV and IPTV to mostly be like PIP , it will be in every television. ANOTHER feature in a TV that people THOUGHT they must have a find out they rarely if ever use. Since the chips are being pushed into all of them any way, at some point US consumer will wait until the cost is cheap enough, vendors will lose money trying to build up this business and push it, but it will be out there for everyone to have. Another concern is how quickly will it be outdated, and need to be replaced. Probably well before you are considering or willing to replace that TV in your home.

Next I will get started on Voice and Motion control TV, which is not about the TV but where you get your content and how that set top box is controlled. Outside of volume control good luck with anything else being NEEDED in your TV, Sure it would be great to select a program on your BRANDED TV. But that doesn't control you Satellite or Cable box in which the vast majority of us use, and use the universal control that comes with it for basically everything. Why do you think there has been little to no need to change the remote for the past 20 plus years!

JZ

Smart TV May Be Too Smart for Its Own Good


Smart TV May Be Too Smart for Its Own Good
Could Smart TV become one of the most short-lived consumer technologies ever, paralleling the laser disc? Is it maybe Dumb TV that we want? As smaller, portable devices like the tablet and smartphone provide our TV content, the television itself may return to being the dumb terminal in the corner, simply displaying what we shoot over to it from our companion devices.

If you've been anywhere near a consumer electronics retailer lately or have leafed through the consumer electronics circulars and ads that supplement Sunday newspapers, you've no doubt noticed the words "Smart TV" shouting out at you.
And if you've been wondering what a Smart TV is, or whether whatever it is may be smarter than you are, read on.
What It Is
Smart TV is the integration of Internet-delivered content with connected televisions. It's distinct from a straightforward IP (Internet Protocol) television delivery where the programming is simply delivered via the Internet, because Smart TV includes OTT (Over the Top) services like Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX) and Hulu, as well as easy access to You Tube and Web browsers with search functions. Social network functionality is also prevalent.
In a Smart TV, these OTT products can be combined with traditional broadcast programming and a cable or satellite provider's own VoD (Video on Demand) services. Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) TV's Smart TV product, for example, is designed to enable a pass-through layer for traditional television.
Smart TVs can be standalone televisions with built-in Smart TV functionality, or they can be set-top boxes enabling additional OTT functionality in existing traditional televisions.
OTT-like and other Smart TV-like functions can also be found on game consoles like Xbox 360, PlayStation 3 and Wii.
LG, Samsung and Sony (NYSE: SNE) are major players in both the all-in-one TV and set-top box markets. Players like Roku and Boxee sell set-top Smart TV solutions that they often call "video streaming receivers."

Flummoxed by Fragmentation

One of the killer business models when it comes to Smart TV, is that it -- like You Tube -- can offer specialized channels. Independent movie theater chain Curzon has just launched an on-demand service via Samsung's branded SmartTV product. These niche apps highlight the fragmentation -- Curzon's channel is not available on Sony's Smart TV product, among others, for example.
"Samsung's SmartTV was the logical choice for Curzon to launch its on-demand TV service, as it currently has the greatest penetration and is the most advanced Smart TV platform available at the moment," said Tom Cape, CEO of Capablue, Curzon's product developer.
"SmartTV is one of the most immersive and interactive experiences for a customer," he told Technewswold, "and with more than 10 million apps already downloaded through Samsung's TV app store, it is proving very popular."

Apple TV and Google TV

Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL) is expected to release an updated Smart TV, or similar product in the future that may include some kind of artificial intelligence or previously unseen UI element. AHbb-Next, a European Hybrid broadcaster unrelated to Apple, is developing a face recognition EPG (electronic program guide.)
Google TV's product will be embedded in televisions from multiple different manufacturers.
"With Google TV, you get unprecedented access to and control of more entertainment for your TV," Matt McLernon from the Google TV team told Technewsworld.
"This includes live TV, millions of new channels from the Web, more than 80,000 movies and TV shows available on demand, and new apps coming to Google Play every day," he said. "We're working closely with our partners to bring lots of ways you can enjoy Google TV, and expect to see more Google TV options coming out later this year."

Shootout and Land Grab

We're already seeing the results of television maker shootouts, with Sony recently announcing 10,000 layoffs -- about 6 percent of its workforce -- as the consumer electronics land grab continues.
Sony has been having a problem competing with Samsung and LG in the TV market, despite an aggressive push into Smart TV. They have been cutting into Sony's market, and we're likely to see more land-grabbing.

Smart TV and the Second Screen

"The trend of viewing live and on-demand programming on smartphones and tablets is accelerating," Mark Hyland, general manager of EMEA for QuickPlay Media, told Technewsworld.
"Seventy-six percent of 18-to-44 year-olds in the UK indicated they are watching more TV on these devices than just one year ago," he noted.

The Road Ahead

And how will it end? Could Smart TV become one of the most short-lived consumer technologies ever, paralleling the laser disc? Is it maybe Dumb TV that we want?
As smaller, portable devices like the tablet and smartphone provide our TV content, the television itself may return to being the dumb terminal in the corner, simply displaying what we shoot over to it using existing streaming technologies like DLNA (Digital Living Network Alliance) or You Tube from our companion devices.
We will see.

Sharp loss for year over $3 Billion

See the article below. Sharp yearly numbers are in, and it continues to be bad news in the Consumer Electronics Industry. TVs again a large part to blame for the over $3 Billion in US dollar loss for Sharp for the year. Technology can't continue to be developed and released and drive such severe losses and have companies continue. Getting new gadgets will be at serious risk, price could skyrocket as the number of companies that can stay in this business dwindle down.

JZ


Sharp Posts Net Loss For Fiscal Year

By Steve Smith -- TWICE, 4/27/2012

Tokyo - Sharp Electronics reported a net loss and a double-digit drop in net sales in its fiscal year, ended March 31.

The net loss was 376 billion yen compared with the prior year's net income of 19.4 billion yen, and sales were down 18.7 percent for the year to 2.46 trillion yen.

Sharp blamed the usual culprits -- the continued strength of the yen, troubles with the Japanese and European economies and a slowdown in China -- and lower demand for LCD TVs.

In its consumer/information products unit, sales were down 25.6 percent to 1.06 trillion yen compared with the prior year due to "sharply decreased demand" in Japan and larger-than-expected price declines, "which was slightly offset by healthy growth of large-size models 60 inches and larger overseas, especially in North America," the company said.

Sharp, which entered into an agreement with Hon Hai Group, the Taiwanese electronics manufacturer that bought a 10 percent stake in the company and is a major Apple supplier, sees some optimism from that and for growing demand for LCDs in smartphones and tablets, but expects the coming fiscal year to "remain unpredictable," the company said.

Friday, April 27, 2012

Nintendo Posts Large Loss

Not getting any easier anywhere in the Consumer Electronics Industry. In the article below read the large loss posted by Nintendo. First Annual Loss EVER for the company.

JZ

Nintendo Posts First Annual Operating Loss

Greg Tarr -- TWICE, 4/26/2012

Tokyo - Nintendo reported Thursday its first-ever annual operating loss of $460.9 million (37.3 billion yen) as sales of its Wii and 3DS systems produced lower-than-expected results.

For the fiscal year, ended March 31, Nintendo reported a net loss of $532.5 million (43.2 billion yen) from a year ago, when the company reported a $958.9 million (77.6 billion yen) profit.

The video game maker also reported a 36.2 percent drop in revenue to $8 billion (647.6 billion yen), from more than 1 trillion yen reported on March 31, 2011.

The 37.3 billion yen operating loss was slightly better than a predicted 41.4 billion yen loss for the fiscal year.

Nintendo saw depressed sales for its Wii, DS and 3DS game systems in the past year.

Sales of Wii consoles dropped to 9.84 million during the fiscal year, from 15 million for the year ending March 31, 2011, Nintendo reported.

Wii software sales also declined to 102.3 million units, from 171 million a year ago.

The handheld Nintendo DS game player saw sales drop from 17.5 million units a year ago to 5.1 million units in past year, while sales of the newer 3DS sold 13.5 million units, helped by a price cut from $249 to $169 that was necessitated by poorer-than-expected sales last summer.

In addition to the launch of some lackluster game titles at the launch of the 3DS, analysts believe Nintendo's handheld gaming business has been adversely impacted by the introduction of gaming apps on smartphones and tablets.

To correct the loss, Nintendo said it will stop selling the 3DS below cost by the middle of the fiscal year ending March 31, 2013, and will add more titles, including a side-scrolling 2D New Super Mario Bros. 2 game and a new version of Animal Crossing.

The video game company is also counting on a strong showing from the launch of the new Wii U console in Japan, the United States and Europe by the end of the calendar year.

Nintendo said the new console will introduce a new style of home entertainment supported by a "unique controller" that embeds a 6.2-inch touchscreen.

Nintendo said it expects to see $10.1 billion (820 billion yen) in net sales and operating income of $432.5 million (35 billion yen) and a net income of $247.1 million (20 billion yen) by March 31, 2013.

Nintendo forecasts sales of 18.5 million 3DS units and 10.5 million Wii consoles in the year ahead.

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Television in home still most watched device regardless of source of content

Some of the latest feedback and reports. Basically regardless of the source that content is being watched on the TVs in your home. With rapid growth of mobile being a fact, the fact also is that they content is being watched in very short intervals. The majority of the time people still would rather watch full length video content on their TV in their home. We will continue to see where this trend goes.

JZ

Whiting: Anytime, Anywhere Video Still Primarily Means Traditional TV At Home

But Nielsen Exec Says Online Video Will Play Increasing Role in Media Choices

John Eggerton -- Multichannel News, 4/23/2012 10:36:56 AM

Nielsen Vice Chairman Susan Whiting plans to tell the Senate Commerce Committee Tuesday, April 24, that while video consumers increasingly are watching video on the best screen available, on more devices and at more locations, 91% of that anytime, anywhere consumption still comes on traditional TV in real time.
And while tablets and smart phones have fueled an explosion in digital access to video, there are still are record number of TV sets in American homes.
Whiting's written testimony, a copy of which was obtained by Multichannel News, is based on Nielsen's latest" State of the Media: Digital Consumer Report."
While 166 million Americans watched video online in October 2011, and more than 117 million accessed the 'net through mobile, she points out that is still mostly in short bursts rather than large blocks of time.
The average monthly total of viewing on mobile devices and computers is a little under nine hours, while the average viewer watches a whopping 146 hours-plus of traditional TV on one of those record number of TV sets.
YouTube and Netflix dominate online video viewing, together accounting for over half 56% of the 4 hours, 31 minutes of average streaming video per month.
She points out that 33.5 million mobile phones now watch video on their phones, up more than a third (35.7%) in only the past year. She concludes that "consumers are saying unequivocally that online video will continue to play an increasingly larger role in their media choices."
Whiting is joining IAC's Barry Diller and other execs to talk about the implications of the migration of video from traditional TV to the Internet.