Pages

Monday, January 30, 2012

Nintendo Wii U will launch before holiday 2012

Latest news on the new Nintendo Wii U!

JZ




Nintendo: Wii U will launch in time for 2012 holiday season, use touch-card tech

Nintendo's president says the Wii U will use touch-card technology in its wireless controllers, which also have touchscreens

By Jay Alabaster, IDG News Service
January 27, 2012 12:35 AM ET

Nintendo said Friday its next-generation Wii U game console will launch in time for the holiday season in the U.S., Europe and Japan.
The successor to the popular Wii console will integrate a popular touch-card technology into its controllers. Nintendo president Satoru Iwata said the device will use NFC, or near field communication, standards that are widely employed in tap-and-go train passes and other payment systems worldwide.
"It will become possible to create cards and figurines that can electronically read and write data via noncontact NFC," Iwata said in a speech, a copy of which was posted on Nintendo's web site.
"Adoption of this functionality will enable various other possibilities such as using it as a means of making micropayments," he added.
The Nintendo chief said final details about the Wii U will be announced at the Electronic Entertainment Expo, or E3, a major annual game exhibition to be held this year in June in Los Angeles.
The Wii U has a large controller that is similar to a dedicated handheld console, with a touchscreen, motion detection and camera. Its small screen can be used to supplement games played on TVs or replace the larger display entirely.
Iwata spoke a day after his company released poor results for the nine-month period through December. It cut its annual sales targets for the 3DS handheld console launched last year, as well as the original Wii, and said it now forecasts a much deeper loss for the fiscal year than earlier predicted.
He said Nintendo has made strong progress with the 3DS, the successor to the smash-hit DS. When the 3DS stumbled after its launch last year, the company responded with large global price cuts less than six months after launch, which eventually spurred sales but weighed heavily on its bottom line. It also announced a fleet of new game titles.
"In the first half of the next fiscal term, we are now anticipating to get out of the situation that we sell the hardware below cost," Iwata said Friday, emphasizing that the company's efforts have paid off and sales have rebounded strongly.
He added that Nintendo is working to expand StreetPass and SpotPass, the peer-to-peer platforms of the device, which let users communicate and compete via their 3DS consoles. The company is also working to expand its fledgling online shop for the device.
Like many Japanese companies, Nintendo's fiscal year runs from April through March.

LG OLED Panel Production begins in July

New report shows that LG will go into production on their 55" OLED panel in July.

JZ

LG Display to start 55-inch OLED TV panel production in July

updated 11:50 am EST, Fri January 27, 2012

LG Display to make 48,000 flat panels per month



Flat panel supplier LG Display has revealed on Friday that it will begin production of its very impressive 55-inch OLED HDTV panel we got a close look at during CES in July. LG itself will put the panel into its 4mm thick, 55EM9600 HDTV, which was also introduced at CES. LG Display's prototype eight-generation production line will reportedly manufacture 48,000 of the panels per month.
This is all part of LG's four trillion won (about $3.56 billion) investment in OLED technology. The company will look at investing into a full 8G production line during the summer. It will also consider retooling current LCD production lines to produce OLED panels. This all likely depends on consumer demand for the advanced OLED TVs, which may be relatively affordable but expensive next to LCD or plasma.

While this isn't being publicly shared or confirmed, LG Display could even supply Samsung with the 55-inch OLED panel for its Super OLED TV unveiled at the same show. [via OLED-Display


Wednesday, January 25, 2012

CES 2012 4K Televisions explained!

Great article on CNET about new technology shows at CES on 4K Televisions. What does it mean, and will it matter. Read and you decide.
 
JZ
 
 
 

What is 4K? Next-generation resolution explained

by
When it comes out this summer, the 84-inch LG 84LM9600 will be the largest LCD the market has yet seen, and one of the first with 4K resolution.
(Credit: LG)
As if LED and3D TV weren't confusing enough, 2012 and beyond will bring an HDTV technology called 4K. It's being heralded as the next high-def, and manufacturers are already lining up to bring you products.
But just as was the case with 3D, it's the hardware chicken before the software egg: there's no consumer 4K content available. Still, if you listen to the industry, it'll tell you it's the last resolution you'll ever need. So what is 4K anyway, and what makes it different from high definition?

Digital resolutions: A primer


The latest in a line of broadcast and media resolutions, 4K is due to replace 1080i/p (1,920x1,080 pixels) as the highest-resolution signal available for movies and, perhaps, television.
Though there are several different standards, "4K" in general refers to a resolution of roughly 4,000 pixels wide and about 2,000 pixels high. That makes it the equivalent of four 1080p screens in height and length. Currently 4K is a catch-all term for a number of standards that are reasonably close to that resolution, and the TVs we'll see this year labeled 4K will actually be Quad HD, defined below. But frankly, we think 4K is the catchier name.
Meanwhile, high definition (HD) itself has been with us for about a decade and is used in Blu-ray movies and HD broadcasts. There are three versions of HD: full high definition 1080p (progressive), 1080i (interlaced), and 720p (also called simply "high definition").
Most television programs and all DVDs are encoded in standard definition (480 lines). Standard definition is the oldest resolution still in use as it began life as NTSC broadcasts, switching to digital with the introduction of ATSC in 2007.
Four resolutions compared: standard definition; full high definition; Quad HD; and 4K/2K.
(Credit: CNET)

The beginnings of digital cinema

The roots of 4K are in the theater.
When George Lucas was preparing to make his long-promised prequels to the "Star Wars" movies in the late '90s, he was experimenting with new digital formats as a replacement for film. Film stock is incredibly expensive to produce, transport, and store. If movie houses could simply download a digital movie file and display it on a digital projector, they could save a lot of money. In a time when cinemas are under siege from on-demand cable services and streaming video, cost-cutting helps to keep them competitive.
After shooting "The Phantom Menace" partly in HD, George Lucas shot "Attack of the Clones" fully digitally in 1080p. This was great for the future Blu-ray release, but the boffins soon found that 1080p wasn't high-enough resolution for giant theater screens. If you sit in the front rows of one of these theaters as it's displaying 1080p content, you may see a softer image or the lattice grid of pixel structure, which can be quite distracting.
The industry needed a standard that works on the proposition that you'll be sitting one-and-a-half times the screen height from the screen, and this required a higher resolution than 1080p. Digital Cinema Initiatives (DCI) was formed in 2002 with the goal of setting a digital standard. Based on these efforts, two new resolutions came about: a 2K specification, and later in 2005, the 4K format.
The first high-profile 4K cinema release was "Blade Runner: The Final Cut" in 2007, a new cut and print of the 1982 masterpiece. Unfortunately, at that time very few theaters were able to show it in its full resolution. It would take one of director Ridley Scott's contemporaries to truly drive 4K into your local Cineplex.

The 4K 'standard'

"4K is at the point of diminishing returns." --Dr. Dave Lamb of 3M Laboratories
Despite the industry's best intentions, there is still no single 4K standard--there are five or more different shooting resolutions available. In cinemas you see projectors based on the DCI specification, which supports both 4K and 2K, while Sony sports its own standard (also 4,096x2,190-pixel resolution) and series of projectors.
Things are a little simpler in the home. The HDMI organization recently added two types of 4K support to its latest 1.4 specification: Quad HD (3,840x2,160 pixels) and 4K/2K, also called 4Kx2K (4,096x2,160 pixels). Only Quad HD conforms to the classic 16:9 ratio of modern television screens.
Meanwhile, some industry experts have questioned the necessity of 4K as a home format given the lack of content and the need for very large displays to appreciate the extra resolution.
"There was a huge, noticeable leap from standard definition to HD, but the difference between 1080p and 4K is not as marked," said researcher Dave Lamb of 3M Laboratories.
Lamb added that "4K is at the point of diminishing returns," but there could be some benefits for screens over 55 inches.

3D

Parts of 'The Phantom Menace' were shot digitally, and the film enjoyed a new lease on life in early 2012 with a 3D cinema release
(Credit: 20th Century Fox/Lucasfilm Ltd.)
Did you see James Cameron's "Avatar 3D" in the theater? Then you've seen 4K in action. Cameron's movie about "giant blue dudes" helped drive high-resolution 4K Sony projectors into theaters around the world, and made a lot of money in the process. Movie studios keen to maintain that momentum have released a slew of 3D films--mostly converted from 2D--and continued the expansion of 3D cinemas.
However, this forward motion hasn't translated to a success for 3D TV in the home.
"Manufacturers would have wanted 3D to be bigger than it was; they wanted it to be the next LED, but it didn't work out," Lamb said.
Given a so-far-mediocre response to 3D, and the expense and bulk of active glasses, manufacturers have begun to search for an alternative, and 4K offers a way increase the quality of the 3D image with passive glasses or get rid of them altogether.

In-home 4K now and the future

The 4K TVs will be big and expensive for the next couple of years.
Both LG and Toshiba will release 4K displays in 2012, and in the absence of 4K media to watch, the main benefit would seem to be the enhancement of 3D quality. The resolution disadvantages of LG's passive 3D system can, in theory, be overcome by doubling the number of horizontal and vertical pixels, allowing 4K passive displays like the LG 84LM9600 (due this summer) to deliver 1080p to both eyes.
The first consumer-grade 4K panel to hit the U.S. market will likely be a 55-inch Toshiba LCD that features autostereoscopic 3D, or "glasses-less 3D" as it's known. It uses the Quad HD specification, which is four times HD at 3,840x2,160 pixels.
No other 4K flat-panel displays have been announced yet. Sony announced its 4K home theater projector, the VPL-VW1000ES, in September, but does not make the product available through its Web site or stores and instead sells it directly to custom installers. Meanwhile, JVC announced four projectors in 2011 that upscale 1080p content to 4K but currently are unable to display native 4K content.
In the absence of 4K content, players and displays will need to upscale 1080p or even standard-definition content. To this end, Sony announced a new Blu-ray player atCES 2012, the BDP-S790, which will upscale to 4K.
Looking to the future, Sony is reportedly keen to have the forthcoming "Spider-Man" reboot become one of the first 4K Blu-ray movies, and is apparently in talks with the Blu-ray Disc Association to finalize the specification.
Tim Alessi, director of home electronics development at LG, said he believed that such a development was not only inevitable but also potentially valuable.
"I do expect that at some point [4K] will be added [to the Blu-ray specification]. Having that content in the home is what the average consumer will want," Alessi said.
Just when we thought we had it all covered, 4K may not even be the final word in resolution. Japanese broadcaster NHK was the first to demonstrate 8K in 2008, and at CES 2012 there were industry murmurings, and at least one prototype, devoted to higher-than-4K resolution.

Conclusion

Will the extra resolution offered by 4K make movies better? You could argue that it depends on the format of the original film. For example, "The Blair Witch Project" and "28 Days Later" were both shot with standard-definition camcorders, and there would arguably be little extra benefit to buying either movie in a 4K native format over a DVD--depending on the quality of the scaler in your brand-new 4K screen, of course.
Even with reference-quality native 4K material, however, a 4K-resolution TV or projector won't provide nearly the visible improvement over a standard 1080p model that going from standard-def to high-def did. To appreciate it you'll have to have sit quite close to a large screen--sort of like being in the front few rows of a movie theater.
But whether it's 4K or 8K, you can bet that manufacturers haven't run out of cards when it comes to trying out the next "must-have" feature in the coming crops of televisions.


Read more: http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-33199_7-57364224-221/what-is-4k-next-generation-resolution-explained/#ixzz1kVIVNC4q

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Hitachi Closes last TV Factory

Another brand basically exits the business of making the TVs. Does not mean the exit of the Hitachi brand on Televisions, but even it in Japan it will be outsourced to someone else to put it together for them.

JZ


TOKYO—Hitachi Ltd. said it will stop producing television sets and outsource all production later this year, as the global electronics makers struggle to make money in the overcrowded, low-margin market.

Hitachi's plant in central Japan's Gifu Prefecture in October will stop making TV sets and focus instead on repairs and making components, the company said. "We can't expect the domestic TV market to grow much, and price competition is getting more and more intense," a Hitachi spokesman said Monday.

Hitachi's TV-set business has been bleeding red ink since the fiscal year that ended in March 2006. The company already outsources production of all TV sets sold outside Japan.

Its sole TV-set factory in Japan makes sets for the domestic market. Ending production at the plant is part of the Japanese conglomerate's effort to shift from consumer electronics toward so-called social-infrastructure operations—such as electric power, railway systems and information technology—where it sees greater potential for growth.

The move also affirms how tough the market is Japan, where domestic manufacturers had enjoyed solid demand for homegrown products. Such demand no longer is assured, following the end of government subsidies that supported record domestic TV-set sales in fiscal 2011.

Hitachi is a relatively minor player overseas, where Japanese heavyweights Sony Corp. and Panasonic Corp. are locked in a contest with South Korean rivals Samsung Electronics Co. and LG Electronics Inc. Also, the yen's strength hurts overseas sales when they are repatriated into the Japanese currency and makes the price of Japan-made goods less competitive overseas.

Even the biggest players are having difficulty maintaining profit margins amid global price competition. Sony and Panasonic also are restructuring their TV-set operations to stanch losses. Panasonic in October said it would stop production at two Japanese TV-panel factories—one making plasma display panels and the other making liquid-crystal display panels—this fiscal year. The decision will leave the company with one plasma-panel plant and one LCD plant in Japan.

Moody's Investors Service on Friday lowered its long-term debt ratings on Sony and Panasonic and gave both negative outlooks, citing uncertainty over their unprofitable TV-set operations.

Wednesday, January 18, 2012

RCA TV video from CES new 3DTV technology!

Key Features:

Big Screen
  • A range of sizes with brilliant LED-backlit LCD screens
  • Traditional CCFL LCD products with screen sizes up to 55"
  • New 3D televisions with 3D depth control
Mobile Digital
  • The new Dyle-ready MIT700 will be available later in 2012
  • Four other models are available that are equipped to receive "in the clear" Mobile DTV transmissions not transmitted with conditional access signaling

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Stadium Viewing in your home from Technicolor demo at CES

Have to admit for the sports fan if they get this right, it will do really well. In a nutshell you can view the game as if you were in the stadium. Based on how you turn your head, and look around, the picture on the screen will move to that location. Technicolor is taking many different shots in key locations of the stadium and bringing it to you in one as your eyes and head determine where on the field you are looking. So basically if you want to look at an empty endzone while the action is at the other end you can, not being forced by the editor at the field to switch you to where they want you to look. More importantly you can continue to look at the players and not be pulled away to the sideline because the editor thinks you want to watch the coach cover his face while talking to the box upstairs about the next play.

See the article and demo video below.

JZ


Technicolor concept brings the stadium to your sofa

CES 2012: Personalised Content


Technicolor concept brings the stadium to your sofa. Home Cinema, Technicolor, CES2012 0
16 January 2012 16:06 GMT / By Stuart Miles

Technicolor has demoed a new technology at this year's CES in Las Vegas that would allow you to watch a football match as if you had actually had a seat in the stadium.
The new tech, dubbed Personalized Content Rendering, which is expected to become a commercial reality in the next couple of years, uses six cameras at the stadium to create the ultimate moving panoramic view.
Where Technicolor comes into the project is through the behind-the-scenes software that merges the six individual video feeds into one before allowing you control over where to look within that picture.
The demo, shown on the company's stand at the trade show, was supposed to be using a Microsoft Kinect sensor for the Xbox 360 tracking your eyes and head movement. However, following some technical issues and too many passers-by confusing the system, Technicolor was forced to use a trackball instead for the purpose of our demo.
That said, the demo easily showed what was possible with the ability to not only look around the entire stadium as if we were there, but also to zoom in on the action, although at the moment that makes the image blurry and out of focus.
To solve this problem Technicolor is also working on letting the software intelligently know when to switch camera views to ones tracking specific players or detailed action.
The result is that the system has plenty of potential for sports broadcasts: allowing you to watch the game how you want to watch it, rather than relying on what an editor thinks is important.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

OLED Television - how much will you pay? Do you even care?

Honestly, I don't think that many people in the US will find much value in a thinner TV. This isn't like going from a very large and heavy CRT or Projection TV down to a 4 inch, and now 2 inch deep TV. So the big question is can the industry properly show the Technology in the OLED in regards to contrast ratio and refresh rate, and will the average US customer be willing to pay what engineers think it is worth. There is generally a large difference between what a customer is WILLING to pay, or attributes a value for vs. what the industry dreams up what they feel they are willing to pay. Funny thing is that the research shows that the ones that dream up the price have answered THEY are not willing to pay that price either. So we wonder why we drop prices so quickly in Consumer Electronics. Are we just setting ourselves up for another round of 50% drops in OLED, putting Margin Pressure or Profit losses again on the table for the TV industry for another 5-8 years. Hmmmmmm.......

JZ

SEOUL—Television manufacturers, stung by steep profit declines this year, will start making TV sets that are even thinner and lighter in hopes of sparking new consumer interest and driving average prices higher.

LG Electronics Co., the world's second-largest TV manufacturer, said Friday it will sell a 55-inch TV that is just 3/16 of an inch thick and weighs only 16.5 pounds. Crosstown rival Samsung Electronics Co., the world's largest maker of TVs, is expected to unveil a similarly sized TV at the industry's big trade fair, called the Consumer Electronics Show, in Las Vegas in early January.

The companies aren't yet talking about pricing, but are expected to charge a hefty premium for the products. NPD DisplaySearch estimates the new 55-inch TV models will start selling for about $8,000 in the third quarter of 2012, falling below $4,000 by the end of 2013 as sales volumes increase and companies find ways to manufacture the sets less expensively.

The new products are a milestone for a display technology that has long been discussed as a potential advance over the two long-dominant approaches for building flat-panel TVs. They come as makers of TVs, and manufacturers of display panels used in them, badly need new features to boost consumer excitement amid severe price declines that are squeezing profits.

NPD DisplaySearch on Tuesday said the average U.S. prices for a 47-inch flat-panel TV have fallen below $1,000 for the first time. Meanwhile, consumers don't appear to be flocking in great numbers to adopt 3-D televisions, as some companies hoped; the research firm says 3-D TVs represent only 8% of North American unit sales.

LG Electronics Inc.
LG Electronics will introduce a new 55-inch television, made with OLED display technology, that will measure just 3/16 of an inch thick.

Both of the Korean companies' new TVs use a technology known by the acronym OLED, for organic light emitting diode, that up to now has only been available in much smaller sizes. The vast majority of TVs use liquid crystal displays, or LCDs, though a sizable minority use plasma technology.

OLED is already used for screens in cellphones and car radios. Samsung, the largest maker of OLED screens for cellphones, also put them into a 7.7-inch tablet computer this past year.

The key advantage for OLED is that the panel itself emits light, eliminating the need for a light source behind it and keeping the overall structure very thin and light. In some cases, OLED creates better color contrast and uses less power.

Sony Corp. in 2008 began selling an 11-inch OLED-based TV in Japan. Priced at $2,200, it sold poorly and the company ended the product in 2010. Other companies, including Samsung and LG, have demonstrated larger-sized OLED-TVs in labs and technical conferences. But until now, no company could cost-effectively produce large OLED screens because of constraints in factory processes.

In announcing its 55-inch OLED-TV, LG didn't say what it would cost. The Seoul-based company said it expects to begin production in mid-2012 and reach full production in 2013.

LG's component affiliate, LG Display Co., recently said it would offer 55-inch OLED panels to LG and other makers in 2012. It also revealed a manufacturing breakthrough that allowed the larger-sized OLED panel.

Small-size OLED screens are created by placing organic material that emits three colors—red, green and blue—on a substrate. When combined, the three colors can form any color. But it's hard to do that on a large screen because larger masks tend to sag in the middle and the materials then overlap on the substrate, making a mess of the pixels.

Material for each color is deposited on the substrate through a fine metal mask, with one mask used for each color so that colors line up in a precise, very close pattern that, to the human eye, appears to create one pixel, or point of light.

LG Display's solution was to stack the three color materials vertically, with the red, green and blue combining into a white pixel. The color is then separated using a filter on the screen, similar to how LCDs show color.

"The patterning issue is a very big problem," Choi Sang-hun, an LG Display engineer, said in an interview. "But we refined a new patterning method with white OLED."

The idea was developed at Eastman Kodak Co. but LG bought that firm's OLED-related patents in 2009. The trade-off is the organic materials have to shine brighter, meaning an OLED-TV made this way will require more power than one made with the factory process used for smaller screens.

Samsung has been working on a factory process that uses the traditional dispersal of the three color materials, though with some refinements. It will initially use that on its OLED-TVs, saidJun Eun-sun, a spokeswoman at Samsung Mobile Display Co., the Samsung affiliate responsible for such components. "But we are not ruling other alternative technologies out," Ms. Jun said.

The development is akin to the emergence of a factory process in the 1990s that allowed the use of LCDs to expand from laptop computers to hang-on-the-wall TVs. The step cut the time required to disperse liquid crystal across a 30-inch screen from five days to five minutes.

Manufacturers have been hoping for a similar breakthrough for OLED screens, which may ultimately prove less costly to make and sell because they don't require lighting, analysts said.

Even with the technical leap, TV makers face another challenge: getting OLED-TVs to a price level that will be competitive with LCD and plasma TVs that are now priced like commodities.

"It's hard to imagine OLED will command too much of a premium in the long run," said Paul Semenza, senior vice president at NPD DisplaySearch "They can argue OLED looks so much better, but it's a risky thing to do because LCD keeps improving thanks to those same companies."

In addition to the OLED TV, LG at the CES trade show is planning to discuss an 84-inch LCD TV based on what it calls Ultra Definition TV, which it has four times the resolution of existing high-definition displays.

Thursday, December 29, 2011

Latest Rumors on Apple Television - could ship in 2012

Apple Wants To Offer Subscription TV Packages, Analyst Says
The rumour mill for a supposed integrated Apple (NSDQ: AAPL) TV set is cranking up, with noted Taiwanese circuits news source Digitimes reporting Apple’s supply chain companies will start making components in the first quarter of 2012.
“Apple’s schedule (is) to launch the new display products in the second or the third quarter of 2012, according to industry sources,” Digitimes says.
“Media reports in Korea also indicated that Samsung Electronics started producing chips for the iTVs in November 2011, while Sharp will produce the displays for the new TVs.” The screens will be 32 and 37 inches, the site says, citing “sources in the supply chain”.
Sterne Agee analyst Shaw Wu writes this note…
“Frankly, we are not surprised and believe AAPL should enter the TV space as this is arguably the only major end market the company is not currently participating in a bigger way.
“Moreover, we have picked up several data points indicating activity from component makers to manufacturing partners as well as AAPL’s own patent filings from at least 2005.
“We believe it makes sense for AAPL to produce Apple TV in both a set-top box as well as an integrated all-in-one version to give users choice.
“From our understanding, the technology including hardware and software isn’t the issue holding back a real Apple TV from shipping. What is are content partnerships and licensing terms that still need to be ironed out, as we mentioned in late-October.
“Today, iTunes has a rich library of movies and TV shows but it is mostly for downloads and only movies are available for rental (TV shows once were but were terminated in August 2011). What’s missing is live broadcast television.
“One obvious way to offer this is via the traditional way where a user subscribes to cable or satellite. But a more revolutionary, disruptive and differentiated way, is via the internet or IPTV which would be more in-line with its iTunes and iCloud model. Because of the high dependence on content providers, we believe exact timing is difficult to pinpoint.
“We continue to hear what AAPL would love to do is offer users the ability to choose their own customized programming, i.e., whichever channels/shows they want for a monthly subscription fee. This is obviously much more complicated from a licensing standpoint. And in our view, would change the game for television and give AAPL a big leg-up against the competition.”
Google’s Eric Schmidt this month said Google (NSDQ: GOOG) TV would be in the majority of TVs by mid-2012.
Sony (NYSE: SNE) has sold its almost 50 percent stake in its LCD screen-making JV, S-LCD, to JV partner Samsung for $940 million, Reuters reports, noting how analysts say the market peaked last year after many western TV owners have converted to flat-screen.
Various authorities have, in recent years, accused LCD makers of having conspired to fix industry prices. Samsung and Sharp are amongst seven LCD makers who have agreed to pay more than $553 million in relation to the charges, Reuters reports separately.

Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Television Business - How much Money can we lose?!

Bottom line - companies need to stop adding in features that US consumers are no willing to pay for. If the value is not there, why lose money bringing items to market that simply have to be marked down. R&D expense goes down the drain. Inventory piles up and is heavily discounted which continues to put quicker unnecessary downward pressure on pricing. US consumer is clearly saying I pay for SIZE and PRICE - BASIC PICTURE QUALITY. We can try to make up a new category as much as we like, but at the end of the day a TV is a TV, the rest is NICHE. If we don't wake up and change direction the TV category will be the next CE category that becomes nothing but a commodity item. This hurts the CE companies, and retailers , and eventually it will be same for consumers. 6-8 years of the Same Old Same Old at CES. No reason to innovate if no one understand the product, value, feature, and converts that to a benefit , need, and attributes a value they are willing to pay to have that item bring those benefits to them.

JZ

For the first time, the average price of a 47-inch flat-panel television is less than $1,000, good news for consumers but the latest sign of tough times for the TV industry.
The psychologically important sub-$1,000 mark—based on a forecast by market researcher NPD DisplaySearch—signals larger screen sizes are becoming affordable to more Americans as a glut of sets and components erodes prices.
Technology companies are banking on everything from smart TVs to low-cost phones as the top trends for 2012. The WSJ's Deborah Kan talks to technology editor Yun-Hee Kim.
But such a slump bodes poorly for the profits of set manufacturers, as well as companies such as Corning Inc., the largest supplier of liquid-crystal-display glass for TVs, and Best Buy Co., the largest consumer electronics chain by revenue.
Prices for the 46- to 47-inch screen size, the largest before "big-screen" models of 50 inches or more, are expected to average $940 in 2011, down from $1,020 last year, said Paul Gagnon, DisplaySearch's director of North American TV research.
"We've got these large screen sizes like 40-inch and 46-inch size class products that are relatively affordable," Mr. Gagnon said. "It's really starting to drive a lot of upgrades."
The low prices reflect slower-than-expected demand and excess production capacity, the research and consulting firm said. DisplaySearch said it expects price erosion to be less significant in 2012.
The pricing woes have reverberated through the television supply chain, leading to losses at LCD panel makers such as LG Display Co. and recent plans by Sony Corp. to slash costs at its money-losing TV operation.
Corning last month slashed its fourth-quarter profit estimates, saying LCD glass prices had fallen farther than expected and that a major South Korean customer backed out of part of a sales contract. Corning said its TV display business had never seen a customer renege on part of an LCD order.
Agence France-Presse/Getty Images
Some consumers went up in TV size instead of features for about the same price. Above, Best Buy customers wheel away a Sharp 60-inch TV.
Retailers have also been burned by lower prices, though Best Buy reported earlier this month TV sales declines at a slower pace in the company's fiscal third quarter than in previous periods.
TV makers have introduced new technologies—such as LED backlights, higher frame rates and 3-D—to bolster demand, but price-sensitive consumers, especially in North America, seem reluctant to pay higher costs for premium features, NPD DisplaySearch said.
In many cases, consumers are opting to trade up in size, rather than features, for a similar amount of money, DisplaySearch said.
Overall, 2.4 million 3-D units were sold in North America, making up 8% of units. The premium for the feature on an average 55-inch set has dropped to about 17% from 33% in the third quarter of 2011, but its adoption is still slower than anticipated. LED backlights carry premiums of 25% to 30%.
Write to Matt Jarzemsky at matthew.jarzemsky@dowjones.com and Ben Fox Rubin at ben.rubin@dowjones.com


Read more: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203479104577124932742565596.html#ixzz1hrC6f7w7

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Sony sells their half of LCD production to Samsung

How tough is this Television business. Sony exits making the CORE part in the Television, the Panel. Not sure how this will work out for them long term given the 8 straight years of negative profit. In the CRT days their Tube and their Technology in the set kept them on top. But since moving to Projection TV , switch to 16 by 9 , and now with Flat Panel they have really lost their way. Need some good news from Sony, not more bad news!

JZ

Sony Sells Stake In S-LCD Joint Venture

By Greg Tarr -- TWICE, 12/27/2011

Tokyo - Sony said Monday that it has begun streamlining its television manufacturing operations and has sold its nearly 50 percent stake in a joint-venture LCD panel factory to co-owner Samsung.

The move affirmed reports out of Japan several months ago that Sony was looking to scale back its television making operations due to increasingly difficult market conditions, including the strong value of the yen against the dollar and South Korean won, and the sustained economic meltdown which has hindered consumer demand for more profitable products.

Revealingly, Sony waited for one of the slowest news days of the year in the Western world - the day after Christmas - to make its less-than-positive pronouncement.

Sony, which ranks in the top three selling TV brands in the U.S. with its Bravia sub-branded LCD TVs, said in a statement that it would sell its stake in the jointly owned manufacturer, S-LCD company, to Samsung of South Korea for $939 million.

The joint venture was established in Tanjeong, South Korea, in April 2004.

However, Sony said it would maintain its LCD TV marketing business in part by outsourcing. It also retains a 7 percent stake in an LCD joint venture panel factory with Sharp.

Last month, Sony warned that it would lose money for the fourth year in a row in its current financial year, which ends next March.

Sony said it expects to show a loss of 66 billion yen, or $856 million, for the last three months of 2011 because of its exit from the Samsung joint venture.

The move, however, should reduce costs in its LCD business by 50 billion yen a year, the company said.

Sony said it would continue to purchase LCD panels from Samsung based on market prices.

Samsung officials said in a regulatory filing Monday that it had approved the plan.

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Multitasking with your Television

Are apps for your Smartphone or Tablet the answer?

See the article below:

JZ

Using Another Screen to Interact With the TV



This week families will gather to celebrate the holidays over home-cooked meals, gift exchanges and fights over the TV remote.
That last annual tradition may be dying off, thanks to changing technology habits. More people now watch TV while simultaneously using second screens like tablets, laptops and smartphones. A recent Nielson study showed 70% of tablet owners and 68% of smartphone owners said they use their devices while watching television.
Sitting down to watch TV and only TV seems like a thing of the past. WSJ's Katherine Boehret profiles three apps that allow viewers a more interactive watching experience.
I, too, find myself watching TV in this multi-tasking mode. This week, I've been testing three free apps that aim to get viewers more engaged in shows as they watch them on TV. Ironically, these apps require people to look away from the TV and at their second screens, but in my experience, this actually worked. I tried Yahoo's IntoNow, which runs on iPhone and iPad and Android smartphones; Showtime Social, which works on the iPad; and Shazam, which works on nearly all mobile platforms, including Apple, RIM, Android and Windows Phones.
I had fun with these apps, and each uses a different method to draw in users. IntoNow and Showtime Social poll viewers during shows, Shazam displays behind-the-scenes footage, and IntoNow displays related social-network updates and live discussions. The apps virtually introduced me to fans of shows I liked, reminding me of my freshman year of college when I piled into a dorm room with 20 people (many of whom I didn't know) to watch the series finale of "Felicity:" The show got more interesting in the company of other fans.
The Showtime Social iPad app polled 'Dexter' viewers to gauge reactions to the show.
Unfortunately, some aspects of these apps aren't designed to work with pre-recorded shows—and more viewers, especially the ones likely to use a second screen, are recording their TV these days. Showtime Social must be used as a show airs. Shazam works with pre-recorded TV shows, but to work with commercials, it must be used live or for as long as an ad campaign is still running. And though IntoNow will work with a pre-recorded show, discussions and related Twitter content aren't live when you use the app after the show airs.
I started with Yahoo's IntoNow app on the iPad. It has a green TV icon in the top left corner that, when I tapped it, listens to whatever is playing. Using its patented SoundPrint technology, IntoNow figured out what was on by matching it against a database of over 160 million hours of TV.
I hesitated to use IntoNow while watching my pre-recorded shows, especially the season finale of "The Amazing Race," for fear of accidentally seeing something that would spoil the ending. The app asks users who contribute to discussions to mark their comments with a spoiler alert symbol, but I didn't want to take any chances.
While watching a football game, IntoNow provided expanded statistics and other team news.
IntoNow was a real help while watching football: Statistics showed up in Game Info, and other team news appeared in an Around the League section. It also brought in Twitter updates from the @NFL_Football Twitter account. But when I paused the game for 20 minutes to fold laundry, I didn't want to look at the app because it showed the live score.
IntoNow failed when I turned on CNN for news of Kim Jong Il's death. The app thought I was watching the regularly scheduled program, a show called "Black in America." IntoNow's vice president said the app has trouble with unplanned programming, something the company is addressing.
The Showtime Social iPad app only works when a show is airing, and it prompts viewers to share their reactions to the show. I watched an episode of "Dexter" with this app opened, and questions popped up every so often, polling the audience. These questions were playful enough that even someone like me, who hadn't watched "Dexter" in two years, could answer them. More thought-provoking questions delved into symbolism and future predictions.
When Showtime Social wasn't asking polling questions, it prompted me to comment on how the show made me feel. I tapped on an icon under the "I am…" description and chose from happy, shocked, sad or angry. A drop-down menu within each emotion offered several iterations; the "angry" category had 13 emotions to choose from.
[DSOLUTION]
Viewers using Shazam could buy things that they saw on USA Network's 'Covert Affairs.
Shazam is an app known best for identifying songs as they play, but it also works with movies, TV shows, ads and music videos to display extra features. To use it with TV, the Shazam logo appears on screen during shows to remind users that they can use the app with a tablet or smartphone; in the case of short commercials, this moment passes quickly.
Since many shows are on hiatus around the holidays, it was hard to find live examples for testing this app. But past examples include the Shazam logo appearing in an Old Navy commercial, and people who used Shazam while watching could get a free pair of jeans. It also worked with Oxygen's "The Glee Project," showing viewers the full version of judge's deliberations if they tapped the Shazam button. And when Shazam was used with USA Network's "Covert Affairs," viewers could buy things that they saw on the show.
Instead of just watching TV, these apps help you get a lot more out of a show—as long as you're watching live.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

Television - what do customers really want

I have a bit of a problem with the types of articles below generated off of consumer research. First and most important, most people do not know WHAT a connected TV does, or more importantly does NOT do. Given the fact that IPTVs do NOT integrate your current line up with the potential of streaming content, it is generally not what people are THINKING of when they answer on-line questionnaires of this sort. It makes for a great article, and claims that we THINK we know what people want, but that data was out there for 3D TV before and why there was a bunch of inventory out there that no one wanted back in May of this year. Also people do not understand that a connected TV still requires you to subscribe numerous time, to a variety of services that all may not add up to what you want to watch. (this is a big reason that CORD CUTTING is NOT happening - people are downgrading the service and living with less options, but when you look through the data, there is actually very LITTLE cord cutting going on)

Final Word - be careful what you chase after based on limited, and questionable data. Without knowing the number of people, actual questions in detail asked, and the level of understanding of those that responded, the data has little if any value.

JZ



Consumers Prefer Connected TV Over 3D

by Aaron Baar, Yesterday, 6:08 PM
/Watching-Despite all of the options available to get one’s visual entertainment, television still is one of the most popular devices out there. According to new consumer research from Parks Associates, 20% of all U.S. households with broadband intend to purchase a new flat-panel television by the end of the year.
Among those households intending to buy a new TV set, nearly three-quarters plan to buy a TV with advanced features like 3D or built-in Internet connectivity, but they’re going much more for the latter than the former.
While the findings don’t necessarily represent the death knell for 3DTV (which has had trouble catching on with consumers), they do show that consumer interests lie elsewhere. “It’s definitely a reflection of consumer sentiment today that is much more highly geared to connectivity and its practical benefit; that is, greater access to content through services such as Netflix and others,” Kurt Scherf, vice president and principal analyst at Parks Associates, tells Marketing Daily. “We’re actually seeing 3D and connected technologies built into a large number of televisions, so consumers are actually getting both capabilities. It’s just that online access to content resonates more strongly with them today.”
With prices coming down, more middle-class families are also getting into the game of buying these advanced TVs, Scherf says. According to the report, 20% of middle class households (those with annual incomes of $50,000 - $75,000) intend to purchase smart TVs this holiday season, compared with 12% of households with incomes about $75,000. Another factor: children. Families with children in the house were more likely to buy an advanced television than those without kids (17% vs. 10%).
But what’s good news for the television makers could be bad news for the content providers, specifically the ones bringing programming into the house. According to the report, consumers who intend to purchase a smart TV this holiday season are also more likely to cancel or downgrade their pay-TV service packages within the next year.
“Through services such as Netflix, Hulu Plus, and ESPN 3, consumers can find a growing number of television content through online outlets,” Scherf says. “As consumers consider their monthly expenditures and think about what content can be found via online channels, smart TVs and other connected consumer electronics present an ever-viable option for consumers to watch programming.”

Monday, December 19, 2011

Apple / Televisions - Latest rumors / talk on the subject

Apple Plots Its TV Assault

  • by JESSICA E. VASCELLARO And SAM SCHECHNER
  • Apple Inc. is moving forward with its assault on television, following up on the ambitions of its late co-founder, Steve Jobs.
    In recent weeks, Apple executives have discussed their vision for the future of TV with media executives at several large companies, according to people familiar with the matter.
    WSJ's Sam Schechner reports on Apple's plans to build its own television that would feature wireless streaming to access shows, movies and content.
    Apple is also working on its own television that relies on wireless streaming technology to access shows, movies and other content, according to people briefed on the project.
    In the recent meetings with media companies, the Apple executives, including Senior Vice President Eddy Cue, have outlined new ways Apple's technology could recognize users across phones, tablets and TVs, people familiar with the talks said.
    In at least one meeting, Apple described future television technology that would respond to users' voices and movements, one of the people said. Such technology, which Apple indicated may take longer than some of its other ideas, might allow users to use their voices to search for a show or change channels.
    Apple is still saying little about what specific software and devices it is working on. The people familiar with the meetings said the Cupertino, Calif., company was "vague" and that Apple hasn't made proposals to license shows for any new product offering.
    Still, the talks—some of which were made at the request of media companies seeking an update on Apple's plans—suggest that Apple's TV strategy is advancing. The technology company often keeps its products and ideas, close to the vest until as late as possible.
    Apple executives have given some specifics in its talks with media companies. The company, for example, has discussed new ways they could stream media companies' content, allowing a user to watch a video on a TV set, then pick up another device, such as a smartphone, and keep watching the video on the move, one of the people familiar said.
    Another person familiar with the talks said the types of new services Apple and the media companies are discussing could be done with Apple's existing technologies, which include its Apple TV set-top box.
    Getty Images
    Apple's Eddy Cue, seen in October, is involved in the company's TV plans.
    Around three months after it started selling a new, $99 version of the set-top box last year, Apple said it had sold more than a million but hasn't provided sales figures since.
    Apple's uptick in talks with its media partners is part of the company's strategy to change the way consumers watch TV, just as the company transformed the music and cellphone industries. Mr. Jobs envisioned building a TV that would be controlled by Apple's mobile devices in order to be easier to use and more personalized, according to people familiar with the matter.
    The company has worked on prototypes for years. Before his death in October, Mr. Jobs told biographer Walter Isaacson that he had "finally cracked it," according to Mr. Isaacson's book.
    The TV device Apple is working on would use a version of Apple's wireless-streaming technology AirPlay to allow users to control it from iPhones and iPads, according to people briefed on the matter. When the company plans to start selling such a device and whether it would receive traditional broadcast or cable signals remains unclear, said these people, who say Apple may change its plans.
    The technology could allow users to stream video from mobile devices to their televisions, without a set-top box. That process is already possible through its Apple TV set-top box, but it is cumbersome and some media companies, such as Time Warner Inc.'s cable channel HBO, prevent their apps from using the technology because they want closer control of how and where their content appears. An HBO spokesman says it hopes to use AirPlay once it is comfortable with the antipiracy protection.
    Apple has worked on technologies for integrating DVR storage and iCloud, its online syncing and storage service, into the device, according to a person briefed on the matter. Such technologies could allow users to watch shows they have saved or purchased on two different devices, like a TV and a computer, without having to buy or record the shows twice.
    Other media outlets have reported that Apple is developing a TV. An Apple spokesman declined to comment.
    Apple is one of a number of companies rushing to re-imagine TV by making it resemble watching video on devices like computers and tablets. Like Apple, these companies are taking the approach of trying to tie together the multitude of devices consumers use daily but that don't currently talk to each other.
    Google Inc. is trying to enable users to access apps and Internet video on traditional TVs through its Google TV software, which shares some technology with its Android mobile operating system and can be controlled via Android and iPhone apps. Microsoft Corp. offers a mobile app to search for and play entertainment content on its Xbox live gaming console, which streams an array of video. Cable, satellite and phone companies are launching their own video services for computers and tablets and reformatting their traditional interfaces to resemble them.
    The efforts are changing the definition of television and the business models around it. In the past, watching television meant tuning in to a TV network live. Now, it means watching video on a broad array of devices from a growing number of providers.
    The pace of change puts media companies that make TV shows and program TV channels in a dilemma. On one hand, they hope that they can increase their profits by selling new services on new devices. But they are worried that a proliferation of new services could undermine the existing TV business, which brings in more than $150 billion a year in the U.S. in advertising and consumer spending on monthly TV subscriptions from cable, satellite and telecommunications companies.
    What kind of cooperation Apple is seeking from media companies remains unclear. Over the years, Apple has had mixed success getting television companies to agree to new business arrangements for its iTunes store.
    The company has also talked to television-service providers about teaming up on new video services for Apple devices, according to people familiar with the matter. It has also broached the idea of licensing content directly from media companies for some sort of subscription-TV service, resembling the packages offered now by cable operators, but the talks have been "exploratory," according to people familiar with the matter.
    In meetings as far back as 2010, Mr. Jobs met with a series of cable and satellite executives to discuss next-generation television services for Apple devices, according to people familiar with the matter. Among the questions Mr. Jobs asked in the series of meetings was how much of the universe of video content the providers actually had the rights to, according to a person familiar with the meetings.
    Apple's own executives have wondered what the company had up its sleeve. Last year, at its "top 100" meeting for senior managers in Carmel, Calif., an attendee asked Mr. Jobs whether Apple was developing a television.
    He responded that it would be a bad business to get into, noting that the margins on television are far lower than the margins Apple makes from its other devices and that consumers don't buy new televisions very frequently, according to this person.
    Write to Jessica E. Vascellaro at jessica.vascellaro@wsj.com and Sam Schechner at sam.schechner@wsj.com